Efficient Account Dismanagement

 

Mismanagement or Dismanagement?

    Agents of Satan run what? The Fed? If the love of money is the root of all evil, how would one describe those who enact monetary policy? Certainly not saints. Having served as career bankers to an extent they arrive at a Federal Reserve committee chair unelect where they are documented noteworthy in the field of mint. They sit in service of whom? The people? The masses? The hoi polloi? The governable? Certainly not! If you believe Thomas Henry Dickerson III breaks bread with Thomás, Ricardo, or his wife Harriet, you're mistaken. "It's all about systems management," he'd say, "Inputs, outputs, and throughputs. Anything to do with humanity is about the predictability of decision-making. If we can 'sway the markets' we convince Bobby, Lou, and Betty Sue to risk what may be against their own self-interests in the short-term for potential gain overall. The fact that people act in their own self-interest is predictable. That people know what is in their own self-interest is not. (With modern tech.) the extent of an individual's knowledge is discoverable, but how one acts on this knowledge is only accurate (not entirely precise) in advance. Action can be influenced or motivated by peer or fear. Inclusionary or exclusionary principles dictate tactics. Those who seek inclusion can be gradually swayed to accept the beliefs of the group. Those who desire isolation can be worked upon in the dark at their own behest, seemingly (again, with a technological assist). You see, those without a strong central belief can be herded like swine from pen to pen for even the promise of slop ("sell me this pen" -WoWS). You can't do that to the Amish for example, but you can convince even those who know this system works against them in the long-term to make little sacrifices to its (The Central Bank's) benefit on the short-term through threat of dissolution. It is not game to simply rob a man. Many who believe "Taxation is Theft" will still pay. This amounts to tacit complicity in the crime committed at his own expense, which is of course, hilarious."

"Historically, sets of data predicted trends en masse. These numerical agglomerations were limited by the Bell Curve's tails (alpha/beta errors::false positive/negative). Some datasets had only an atrocious 60% certainty (if you cut both tails) which was found too volitile for our most conservative clients, who maintain 1% of 1% of the world's wealth. While some novice statisticians might recognize these individuals as most error-ridden, (given their position's distance from normalcy on a wealth chart), they fail to recognize whose Providence allows these realizations!" Earthbound gods of status claim their divinity...

Efficiency vs. Inefficiency (as a Virtue)

Why does the socialist want to raise taxes? In the historical marketplace, ones works are performed with a notion of compensatory measure. Greenbacks in this case. Taxation on goods and services render the product more expensive. An x% increase in tax rate implies an x% increase in the cost of goods sold (COGS). In order to combat what occurs in markets naturally, socialists also demand price-fixation. When prices are fixed for COGS however, this directly impoverishes the working body in the restricted market. Neither man nor market are freed by policy. And where does the money go? To build roads and schools? Often not! Central planners of the regime are inefficient versus division of labor. Business-members under restrictions are either impoverished or disincentivized to operate. Action is opposed. Only operations at scale are streamlined because they are approved by operational mechanisms furnished to benefit only those closest to the centralized committee, followed by the well-connected and radially outward to the masses on the fringe, (most of us if we are honest with ourselves). How is socialism not elitist? Must every ethos be universal? Is science applied to society social science? Observe. An economist, one type of social scientist, studies households. A military general, another type of social scientist, studies "divide and conquer." A psychologist studies mental health and insanity. A political scientist studies the human condition. The general, most highly ranked, employs the others to achieve his goals. The socialistic military-industrial complex divides the wealth, homes, and minds in order to inculcate it's beneficent power. What? You don't think you need to defend yourself from foreign invaders? I have news for you! They want what you have and they don't want to pay for it either! Only the 'operations at scale' are protected by their titanic chthonic girth! Who cares if a few goods furnished by slaves are stolen? How are businesses and nations immune from old age, corruption, and eventual death? Corruption is often literal. With a bad heart and a sick mind a person's actions are deemed poor. A murder, a violent abuser, a person who steals, etc. are removed from businesses and nations to put a halt to corrupt insanity before irredeemable suffering resulting in terminal luck. Who wants to see America die? Looters, pillagers, and rapists: foreign spies, enemies of the state, and the occasional Karen who fails to connect action with consequence. Desire is the root of suffering. Just because you don't want the consequences doesn't mean you can change consequence as you can action. But people don't want to change their behavior, which makes them predictable, which internally validates the average social scientist's course of study.