Mismanagement or Dismanagement?
Agents of Satan run what? The Fed? If the love of money is the root of all evil, how would one describe those who enact monetary policy? Certainly not saints. Having served as career bankers to an extent they arrive at a Federal Reserve committee chair unelect where they are documented noteworthy in the field of mint. They sit in service of whom? The people? The masses? The hoi polloi? The governable? Certainly not! If you believe Thomas Henry Dickerson III breaks bread with Thomás, Ricardo, or his wife Harriet, you're mistaken. "It's all about systems management," he'd say, "Inputs, outputs, and throughputs. Anything to do with humanity is about the predictability of decision-making. If we can 'sway the markets' we convince Bobby, Lou, and Betty Sue to risk what may be against their own self-interests in the short-term for potential gain overall. The fact that people act in their own self-interest is predictable. That people know what is in their own self-interest is not. (With modern tech.) the extent of an individual's knowledge is discoverable, but how one acts on this knowledge is only accurate (not entirely precise) in advance. Action can be influenced or motivated by peer or fear. Inclusionary or exclusionary principles dictate tactics. Those who seek inclusion can be gradually swayed to accept the beliefs of the group. Those who desire isolation can be worked upon in the dark at their own behest, seemingly (again, with a technological assist). You see, those without a strong central belief can be herded like swine from pen to pen for even the promise of slop ("sell me this pen" -WoWS). You can't do that to the Amish for example, but you can convince even those who know this system works against them in the long-term to make little sacrifices to its (The Central Bank's) benefit on the short-term through threat of dissolution. It is not game to simply rob a man. Many who believe "Taxation is Theft" will still pay. This amounts to tacit complicity in the crime committed at his own expense, which is of course, hilarious."
"Historically, sets of data predicted trends en masse. These numerical agglomerations were limited by the Bell Curve's tails (alpha/beta errors::false positive/negative). Some datasets had only an atrocious 60% certainty (if you cut both tails) which was found too volitile for our most conservative clients, who maintain 1% of 1% of the world's wealth. While some novice statisticians might recognize these individuals as most error-ridden, (given their position's distance from normalcy on a wealth chart), they fail to recognize whose Providence allows these realizations!" Earthbound gods of status claim their divinity...
Efficiency vs. Inefficiency (as a Virtue)
Why does the socialist want to raise taxes? In the historical marketplace, ones works are performed with a notion of compensatory measure. Greenbacks in this case. Taxation on goods and services render the product more expensive. An x% increase in tax rate implies an x% increase in the cost of goods sold (COGS). In order to combat what occurs in markets naturally, socialists also demand price-fixation. When prices are fixed for COGS however, this directly impoverishes the working body in the restricted market. Neither man nor market are freed by policy. And where does the money go? To build roads and schools? Often not! Central planners of the regime are inefficient versus division of labor. Business-members under restrictions are either impoverished or disincentivized to operate. Action is opposed. Only operations at scale are streamlined because they are approved by operational mechanisms furnished to benefit only those closest to the centralized committee, followed by the well-connected and radially outward to the masses on the fringe, (most of us if we are honest with ourselves). How is socialism not elitist? Must every ethos be universal? Is science applied to society social science? Observe. An economist, one type of social scientist, studies households. A military general, another type of social scientist, studies "divide and conquer." A psychologist studies mental health and insanity. A political scientist studies the human condition. The general, most highly ranked, employs the others to achieve his goals. The socialistic military-industrial complex divides the wealth, homes, and minds in order to inculcate it's beneficent power. What? You don't think you need to defend yourself from foreign invaders? I have news for you! They want what you have and they don't want to pay for it either! Only the 'operations at scale' are protected by their titanic chthonic girth! Who cares if a few goods furnished by slaves are stolen? How are businesses and nations immune from old age, corruption, and eventual death? Corruption is often literal. With a bad heart and a sick mind a person's actions are deemed poor. A murder, a violent abuser, a person who steals, etc. are removed from businesses and nations to put a halt to corrupt insanity before irredeemable suffering resulting in terminal luck. Who wants to see America die? Looters, pillagers, and rapists: foreign spies, enemies of the state, and the occasional Karen who fails to connect action with consequence. Desire is the root of suffering. Just because you don't want the consequences doesn't mean you can change consequence as you can action. But people don't want to change their behavior, which makes them predictable, which internally validates the average social scientist's course of study.
1/28/26
If the
government serves any legitimate purpose it is to maintain law and order. All
they seem to uphold is status quo and decorum anymore. They give the people what they’re used to,
with slight alterations. The law and
order ideal has shifted to a sort of Robin Hood scam where Gmen act like their
job is to take money and redistribute.
Criminality is not biological or psychological, it’s
socio-economic! No one is born bad and
they didn’t have a choice!
I’ve
seen protesters/rioters outside Minnesota governor’s mansion getting
encouragement from Walz. Not much different from J6 if you pick
sides. That people believe anyone in
government (Trump or Walz/red or blue) is on their side is the effectiveness of dualistic propaganda. They all act ‘above the law’ and this is the big lie right now; that no one is (with the exception of poor Juan).
Now, I
could understand fleeing an area unsafe to find sanctuary. Many seeking sanctuary status are doing so
because of US intervention/destabilization.
More people, at the top, ought to be removed (if not criminally charged)
for bad policy (if not outright crimes against humanity). Fact is, people care more about what’s going
on in their own backyard because it’s visible.
See is believing. While I think
that elitist pedophiles are banging minors on Epstein Island, I know that my
car has been broken into and I’m being stolen from. This is effective government inverted
(perhaps perverted). A riot in the
streets effectively distracts from attention spans, limited.
1/12
Why respect? How is a
man with a gun different from an ICE agent?
While ICE’s gun ownership may be secondary to their identity, the fact
remains of ‘man with gun.’ Even those
who fear and eschew weaponry respect its presence as an agent of change; the
firearm factor. Factory subsidies make
rocket-launchers cost-prohibitive. Fear
of the law restricts a weapon’s use.
What is overkill?
Migrating animals assess the risk of roadkill. A fivetenfifty car pileup
on the 204 in rush hour from freak conditions.
Ice on the road demands respect.
It’s cold and scary outside.
There’s safety in numbers until yours is up. A series of bad decisions led me here: the
page. I slept like shit, woke up and
smoked with ill intent. I’m gonna put
something on paper whether you like
it or not ‘cause I’m a bad boy with powers; assumption of risk for one. Mind of a real actuary: figures in
percents. Especially now, since the
States ceased forging pennies, it’s all in your head. Ten percent of twenty is my two cents. If I can rub it, it’s real.
Faith: the power of trust, is two. I could just believe it’s rubbable.
Touch distance. Touch time. Touch
pretending. Touch the liar in her sleep:
apprehend. Roust the tactile
strumpet. “Put her in cuffs.”
“Yes, daddy!”
“Not a protester, move on,” ICE man radios his CO. “We want to catch one resisting arrest.”
What forces of nature are unstoppable?
“They can’t detain us all!” A swarm of
Karen’s like yapping terriers go to town.
“Dog: Taylor Swift tee shirt spotted with coffee stains. 210. A real doozy.” Police-tape like streamers announce the party
of politics. Like dogs by the door, they
anticipate, but what do bad dogs expect?
And what would you do if they all started biting each other? Pull them apart? Or let them eat one another? “Do you think the man with the gun is
incapable?” the officer radios with his vision.
“Let’s check!” She tests a priori rationale by not overly
considering the scenario. Why respect
what is regrettable? Because we loved her once.
(And we know they’d kill us too for profit.)
2/14
Eating a creative gruel; low salt yet spicy. It burned a hole in my tongue.
It reminded me of her; bad and familiar.
How could I be so cruel?
The nature of our relationship and the things she put me through left me
bittersweet.
Too much kneading, “we’re trying to make a biscuit, not a bagel!”
“I can’t do it anymore: pretend to love. I feel like
a big phony when I go anywhere.”
What is it to feel anymore?
Why is it selfish to be numb?
The pain and suffering some endure defies comprehension. It’s not a thought-process I’d want to get
stuck in through too much cogitation, overestimation, or overidentification
with prisoners or their guardian-tormentors.
We know what happened at Stanford. We know bad acting when we see it. Would it be so different if the roles were
reversed? “Why must I act peacefully to
mask the violence in my heart I want so badly to react with? Where is the power I once held over every
other man?”
In hindsight it was obvious. Rapists and
murderers always begin by hiding their guilt in a lie. Career actors, some might say. Whose guard keeps an eye all night?
2/15
“And there shall be signs in the Sun, and in the moon, and
in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea
and the waves roaring;” Luke 21:25
I ask Perplexity®, “Is there a society where prisons
did not exist and what happened to criminals in those cultures?”
Summary:
Small-scale & Stateless:
·
Homicide by kin or community.
·
Banishment.
·
Social shunning or loss of status.
Premodern Agrarian:
·
Corporal punishment
·
Capital punishment
·
Fines and confiscation
Modern:
·
Exile and outlawry
This means a person is stripped of legal protections – the State
spends no more resources on the outlaw.
Even the apparent murder of the outlaw would go uninvestigated.
·
Restrains or marks
Unlike “Premodern Agrarian: Corporal,” the physical mark is
a bulky monitoring device or simply a bureaucratic stigma, making it difficult
for the criminal to find gainful employment in an open market, where a
business-person, when given the choice, would likely hire someone without a
criminal record.
·
Remote labor
This involves sending the prisoner to perform undesirable
tasks that are necessary, but not typically chosen by the general population
without remuneration that would otherwise make the enterprise unprofitable.
I ask, “why prisons?”
·
State-building.
The state building buildings which ultimately announce
control of territory.
·
Reformist penology.
“To err is human; to forgive, divine.” One must ask forgiveness. Will I be forgiven? Should I be forgiven? How is one forgiven? How is one reformed? Is reformation possible within the confines
of the penal colony (if at all?)? Sure,
we all grow up and then grow old, but how is one reformed? The idea of reformation requires a
subject. An individual or an
institution; who or what is reformed? It
can’t just be that they look
different…
Here we have a formulaic furrow -
a channel in the mind, deepening with
each eroding pass. We watch a
documentary
with our baby on the sofa, a lovechild
of Hollywood that defies criticism. [100% on Rotten Tomatoes™]
It’s another movie about cruelty.
How cruel?
Because it defies normal comprehension
it requires empathy; an element of psyche
socialworkers believe is a limited resource (like space at home).
Because empathetic psyche is resource-limited
there arises an argument of value.
This is an economic discussion after all 😐
“How to Better Serve the Incarcerated?”
The title of the brochure received
in the new-hire employee-pack for the Wendy’s®
opening in Gattaca: The penal commune
constructed to better house convicted felons.
“The ‘luxury condos’ in development C
get a little rapey after eight, so we
close after seven,” the manager says.
“Make sure somebody walks you to your car.
Our last fry-cook caught AIDS and
it wasn’t airborne!”
The furrows deepened. “Why
was I selected?”
the newhire thought, “or did my empathy apply?”
Identity molesteé. “Will I molest
myself or
will society?” In subdivision C, zone 3,
your odds are five points higher than four.
6 than 7.
What makes a place feel safe (esp. after dark)?
Lights and trust. Why trust what I know
is
not true? How could you? How can common
sense be defied? The movies!
“So you chose to align with Barabbas?”
The brochure continued, “…you might be a Jew!”
The cleanliness and decency of the kitchen and
staff didn’t escape the newhire’s notice,
taking in his newsurroundings and newidentity.
“Yes, someone else was tortured to death
along with the grief of suddenly and violently
losing a lovedone to a family and a friend
to the community, but at least a murderer is
finally free.”
Heartstrings soar and ivory tinkle for
Robert Earl Council aka Kinetik Justice,
protagonist of HBO Max’s 2025 documentary “The Alabama Solution.” He had been incarcerated
for the 1996 murder of Robert Talmadge Henderson. This occurred during an incident wherein RTH
was attempting to sell an assault rifle.
REC left a party with three of his friends to meet RTH w/r/t sale of
Chinese-made SKS rifle. During the
course of the meeting, REC instructed a member of his party to steal the gun
from RTH. When this occurred, the party
fled in car. RTH caught up with thieves
and blocked them with his car. REC
proceeded to shoot RTH twice in the head.
In the film, REC claims the murder was a “last resort” and “self-defense.” One is led to believe his assertion since no
information to the contrary is presented.
Reading between the lines, it is conceivable the murder was racially
motivated, therefore a hate crime.
Here are the books on REC’s shelf:
Yurugu:
An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior by
Marimba Ani (1994)
“…reveals the
inner-workings of global white supremacy.”
Metu Neter by Ra Un Nefer Amen (1990)
Egyptian
amalgam religious text central to the Ausar Auset Society: a Pan-African
spiritual organization. REC describes
this as, “my spirituality.”
Jailhouse Lawyers: Prisoners Defending Prisoners vs. the USA by Mumia Abu-Jamal
(2009)
Wesley Cook
aka Mumia was
sentenced to death after the 1981 killing of Philadelphia police officer,
Daniel Faulkner. This occurred when his younger brother was engaged in a
physical altercation with the officer DF and WC being in the vicinity, decided
to intervene. Mumia’s sentence was reduced
to life imprisonment after appeal. This
was also potentially racially motivated.
2/22/2026
This last listing is only to highlight
a thought process viz. Afro-centrism which made to be perceived as a somehow more
legitimate form of racial supremacy than those of Council’s captors, obviously
white. What happens when one tells a lie
with its intention to be perceived truthful and the liar succeeds? The liar experiences a form of
supremacy. “I’m smarter than you and I
can create reality the way I want despite you or any rule I want to lie out of
existence.” A feeling approaching
omnipotence: megalomania. Metu Neter
mind control.
What else was
he reading? Investing 101 – “something
to keep my mind occupied,” he shrugs off with a smile, was if it were a silly
pipedream. If you look at the movie poster
for “The Alabama Solution,” you’ll notice front and center a smartphone. The initial thought about the phone’s prominence
is validated because this is the way much of the movie is filmed, through
smuggled technology. However, funny
thing about smartphones is many people underutilize their full potential. They can be used for more than games and social
media posts. Beyond the obvious utility
as a mass communication device, there are programs such as Cash App® that can
be used to send and receive money as well as make financial investments. That’s on the simplistic side. Having all day to study the markets on said
device and unlimited time to research and day trade, one is able to set up
something on the outside. How does this
align with the ideal ethos of ‘reformist penology’? Is this behavior consistent with someone
seeking forgiveness for a heinous crime committed in cold blood? Obviously REC’s not going to work ‘slave
labor’ for a pittance when he can make more on drugs in solitary than the line
cook.
3/2/2026
“Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent.” – Adam Smith
At this point I can’t remember exactly
how the issues and topics presented in “The Alabama Solution” were brought up
other than evidence of apparent generational injustice associated with white supremacy
esp. in the South. I haven’t really
stayed up to date on movies in the last ten years or so because of ubiquitous
CGI, increase in prices that don’t match value of product, and redundant
narratives that are thinly veiled propaganda served by monolithic mega-corporations? While prior to this shift in the zeitgeist,
this could be traced to obvious product-placement, with a main character
reaching for a Coke®/Pepsi® product or certain auto manufacturers being
featured. More recently the product (the
movie) is less driven by marketing consumer products in a free market and more
so aligned with a political agenda. This
ostensibly began with The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which in short lifted a ban that prohibited
Defense spending aimed at domestic audiences.
One meaning of this I could imagine, is that now Hollywood producers are
not limited to millions in corporate advertising budgets, but have access to
billions in national defense spending - the system that prints money and doesn’t
comply with its audits. Because I’m
dubious of historical of systems set up and incorporated by people like Goebbels as well as
modern Zionism (responsible for the genocide of Palestinians) and their
affiliates in Hollywood, I disconnect.
How does this
relate to “The Alabama Solution”? I’ve
always been a fan of the horror genre: the lighting, make-up, themes, and the
occasional moral embedded. It’s
gruesome, grotesque, meant to shock and awe, and if you suspend disbelief, also
quite terrifying! Before her debut as
head writer and director of “The Alabama Solution,” Charlotte Kaufman was
better known as “Dance-off Zombie #1” in Poltrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead and a slew of other such roles in B-Movie horror directed by
her father Lloyd Kaufman. Charlotte
brought up and saturated in this milieu, I imagine, may have developed and
evolved her father’s movie magic techniques.
One feature I find unique and compelling about this movie is its
parallel to other horror movies in the “found footage” genre championed by “The
Blair Witch Project” being what I would call “smuggled footage.” This provides the real-feeling necessary for
the exposé by providing a series of grainy, lurid, and secretive scenes filmed
furtively from the inside. What has put
a ‘bug up my ass’ so to speak about this movie is that my friend doesn’t see
this as entertainment, but as a source of validity through verisimilitude to
champion a debatable position.
Scientific method this is not!
There is scant data, obviously skewed to skewer the deep dark South. As if other states didn’t have crime problems
and incongruities. Just to say, I’m
giving this issue as much respect as I am able to observe without losing my
ever-loving mind!
3/13
Recidivism’s Turnstile:
If reports are to be believed, the U.S. rate of recidivism is
about 62% in 3-years and 71% in 5.
Alabama’s is about 30% in 3 years, actually half the U.S. average! (Something’s
working!)
This means it is known that 62 or 30 out of 100 will reoffend respectively.
Like letting off a bomb in a
community, unnecessary violence. If sex
is as violent as Jane’s Addiction suggests, the self-perceived/egoistic alpha
who’s always done things a certain way and is unreformed in action or behavior
will behave or act predictably according to his circumstances and its internal
conditions. More machine than man, the replicant
threatens humanity with its separateness characterized by ‘lack of empathy.’ Because of this atypical damage to the
amygdala, the replicant cannot feel what most call an internal condition common
to human experience. When one is
deficient in whatever chemical cofactor is produced by this part of the brain,
the replicant must be made to believe that their actions damage the so-called
fabric of society they are hostile toward (an attitude typical of sociopathy)
to the extent the replicant is internally motivated by understanding fully (to
the bone) action’s consequences at the very least (if they won’t accept the Eucharist).
Now, Timothy Leary was able to discover
that administration of LSD
and other psychedelics had a positive effect on recidivism rates overall in the
1960’s, meaning it has been known for very many years that this administration of
certain therapies (drug and likely others) could greatly reduce duration of the
reformatory process (assuming reform over punishment). Although, the reduced percentage was not
zero, it’s worth exploring. Is there an ‘empathy
test?’ Empathogens (MDMA) and entheogens
(LSD, psilocybin, etc.) as classes of medicine have the potential to heal what
is psychically embedded (like in the lion & mouse
from “Aesop’s Fables”), however even these medicines, while powerful, do not
appear panacea. There would have to be
administration with follow-up testing to be valid. While potentially costly, I would believe it’s
cheaper than lengthy prison stays.
However, part of the equation is justice for the victim or victim’s
families, which I don’t believe ought to be discounted. Until withholding
forgiveness is no longer justified, which is what demands arbitration. Proof of reformation? Because this is often (calculable) not a
one-time thing, there is recidivism, hence people calling for even harsher
punishment, hence the death penalty for serial reoffenders who continually
betray the public trust and social order.
It seems devious or insidious, but
what if the purpose of prisons were not indeed reformation or punishment, but simply
a continuation as a means to justify the institution, or the criminal justice
system itself corrupted? What if it’s
unspoken yet fundamental purpose were to enslave and exploit labor as cheap as
can be? “Well now that sounds like a public relations nightmare! I suggest you mock-yell ‘conspiracy!’ back in
their faces if confronted,” when the label ‘conspiracy theorist’ defined a break
in sanity. Now, at least a larger
minority are aware that our food and water on a large scale has been tampered
with. Poisoned some might say.
With our only hope being RFK Jr., head of Health and Human Services, who
is vilified by many public relations
representatives of the industry cartels.
At the moment, I think most of us just want to the madness to end, even
if it’s with limited liability.
Ah, the corporate CEO’s ‘golden parachute.’ Can he/she really know about everything that’s
going on along the supply chain? Isn’t
that their job? “Well, who else
authorized the toxic chemical dump just outside the big city that made the land
uninhabitable for miles and probably shouldn’t be inhabited for more miles still?” While death is inevitable (so they say!)
acceleration pushes life towards its limit or end, and it is this push that is
the criminal act. A juror at a trial of
a man for an act that constitutes ‘assault and battery’ for instance is not
easily confused by the defense’s argument if there is ample evidence, clear
depictions, and lucid witnesses from the prosecuting attorney. “And the district attorney’s office is up to
its eyeballs in domestic cases!” a D.A.’s paralegal complains, “Who has the
time to build a case against the ‘big corporate cartel’ with gang members
jamming the turnstile?”
In a market free enough to allow
slavery (oxymoron) for-profit prisons
thrive by cutting as many deals as they can.
Could include letting them out to reoffend to jam the D.A. to protect
cartels?
3/7
A Return to Plato’s Cave:
Mass surveillance
applied to inmates who receive most of their
news and information from the shiny slave slab.
There is a cult of true believers more insidious
than Islamist or Zionist. There are
those
whose truth is brought down from on high via
satellite, whose steeples dot the mountain tops
of the yet wooded lands, casting omnipresent
radiation unto tithing adherents.
Almost all partake and revel. Almost all
secrets revealed.
Hive minding my own business like an FBI redactionist.
There is certain truth derived from beauty. Its beholder
carries the radiant beauty everywhere it can go
as a source of comfort and protection from the ignorant
Android users. Form, function, and elegant design
features distinguish the more becoming and elevated
Applelitists, whose Intel® is more profound than thou’s.
3/11
Why is “The Alabama Solution”
propaganda? It produces the ‘red
herring’ of race to distract from the crimes being perpetrated by those of a
certain class (who have the means to defend themselves, discussed later). By granting leniency, knowing recidivism
rates, one clogs the courts with repeat offenders. This not only creates another victim, but
overburdens public defenders, who may enter the system with good intentions,
presumably. After years of abuse, many
of these well-intentioned attorneys may discover pathways in their profession
that would lead to more money (much more) and less abuse (much less). This decision to abandon certain positions
would be well reasoned. Some are beyond
saving, viz. members of a certain class. “Just the way these crimes are committed; the
savagery, the randomness and raw brutality.
Who could stand to live amongst these heathens?” And having let’s say years of first-hand
experience, they be justified, even vindicated.
They had dared to combat structural, race-based inequality in a corrupt system
head on and failed. “But I tried,
dammit, and that’s what counts!”
Who has the power to put the system on trial?
Presumably, the President. What if the
President
were the source of corruption itself, himself
a product, auto-generating, replicant.
Consider cronyism:
1. 1) Zionist
2. 2) Classist
3. 3) Racist
The third part
obfuscates the other two. While not
fully actualized, in theory, it seems that many students have begun to look less
at skin color than character content as MLK Jr. advocated and many more modern
scholars have re-envisioned. However
many see things ‘illegal immigration’ as primarily racial, which is true on the
surface, since those from disparate places tend to look different from one to
another. Thing is, it’s not so much
about the immigrant’s national or racial background as much (and not even about
legal status half the time) as it is about the person’s intention. Most level-headed people see little problem
with a person who arrives who seeks to assimilate. People have problems with disassimilation, that is, seeking to
alter the very ‘fabric’ that people find ‘charming’ about a certain place. These people tend to work harder for less
money, which is fair trade in a free market, and only becomes problematic when
native-born people who wish to remain in their position are displaced. However
these people also tend to work in industries that not only require low-bar
skill-sets, but are positions that are in short supply and high demand. Typical in industries like farming or fast
food for example. On the surface this is
no problem for anyone, besides perhaps a minority of bigots or
hard-liners. The problem most (rational)
people have is that some of these people commit violent crimes or welfare fraud
(this seems to be a moving bar from state to state). This seems obvious: if you let in a million
migrant random sample, a known percentage, let’s say one percent, will be
psychopathic, regardless of race. I’ll
leave it here for now.
The second part is squeezed [middle
class] for its labor. Rewarded enough to maintain its integrity. Useful to the
extent its demands are easily met. There
is a baked-in moral code/identity that associates hard-work with good
grace. This is their primary
identity. They also have first-hand
experience with the truth that hard work does
indeed produce and promote good grace.
Replicants upset this dynamic.
They can perform the labor of manifold men and will learn faster with
more precision. Replicants don’t require
religion, they just do, even on Sundays, the lord’s work without rest of failure,
in theory. Unfortunately it becomes
increasingly necessary to convince the humans to believe they must serve the
machine before the android robot replicant [ARR] becomes able to fully service
itself.
So this is
where the Zionists enter to promote a utopian vision so convincing, the average
human believes they are not only replaceable, but they should actively seek
their own retirement. (Why work when you
can be served?!) Unfortunately the
Zionist vision is inherently Jewish, which most understand as primarily
hereditary. “It’s not like you can just join the club if you want. Otherwise
everyone would do it! Best you can hope
for a place in the pyramid schemery as far as you can. Unfortunately it’s too much of a hassle for
many to metaphorically drag themselves to such a position with competition and with
the beatings and the heat, many are smart to give up on the whole endeavor. All
you earn is a more public burial. Not to
mention they’re all kinds of sick freaks up there near the top. People you wouldn’t want to know. Better off just trying to blend in.” A utopian vision is also more convincing as
worthy of achievement when compared with disutopia/dystopia. Which circles back around to movies like “The
Alabama Solution,” that presents the dystopia along with a utopian vision that
either downplays the severity of crime committed, or overestimates ease of
rehabilitation. The Zionist is neither
here nor there; in the prisons or the streets, so the results of the exposé
matter less than its ratings.
