Mismanagement or Dismanagement?
Agents of Satan run what? The Fed? If the love of money is the root of all evil, how would one describe those who enact monetary policy? Certainly not saints. Having served as career bankers to an extent they arrive at a Federal Reserve committee chair unelect where they are documented noteworthy in the field of mint. They sit in service of whom? The people? The masses? The hoi polloi? The governable? Certainly not! If you believe Thomas Henry Dickerson III breaks bread with Thomás, Ricardo, or his wife Harriet, you're mistaken. "It's all about systems management," he'd say, "Inputs, outputs, and throughputs. Anything to do with humanity is about the predictability of decision-making. If we can 'sway the markets' we convince Bobby, Lou, and Betty Sue to risk what may be against their own self-interests in the short-term for potential gain overall. The fact that people act in their own self-interest is predictable. That people know what is in their own self-interest is not. (With modern tech.) the extent of an individual's knowledge is discoverable, but how one acts on this knowledge is only accurate (not entirely precise) in advance. Action can be influenced or motivated by peer or fear. Inclusionary or exclusionary principles dictate tactics. Those who seek inclusion can be gradually swayed to accept the beliefs of the group. Those who desire isolation can be worked upon in the dark at their own behest, seemingly (again, with a technological assist). You see, those without a strong central belief can be herded like swine from pen to pen for even the promise of slop ("sell me this pen" -WoWS). You can't do that to the Amish for example, but you can convince even those who know this system works against them in the long-term to make little sacrifices to its (The Central Bank's) benefit on the short-term through threat of dissolution. It is not game to simply rob a man. Many who believe "Taxation is Theft" will still pay. This amounts to tacit complicity in the crime committed at his own expense, which is of course, hilarious."
"Historically, sets of data predicted trends en masse. These numerical agglomerations were limited by the Bell Curve's tails (alpha/beta errors::false positive/negative). Some datasets had only an atrocious 60% certainty (if you cut both tails) which was found too volitile for our most conservative clients, who maintain 1% of 1% of the world's wealth. While some novice statisticians might recognize these individuals as most error-ridden, (given their position's distance from normalcy on a wealth chart), they fail to recognize whose Providence allows these realizations!" Earthbound gods of status claim their divinity...
Efficiency vs. Inefficiency (as a Virtue)
Why does the socialist want to raise taxes? In the historical marketplace, ones works are performed with a notion of compensatory measure. Greenbacks in this case. Taxation on goods and services render the product more expensive. An x% increase in tax rate implies an x% increase in the cost of goods sold (COGS). In order to combat what occurs in markets naturally, socialists also demand price-fixation. When prices are fixed for COGS however, this directly impoverishes the working body in the restricted market. Neither man nor market are freed by policy. And where does the money go? To build roads and schools? Often not! Central planners of the regime are inefficient versus division of labor. Business-members under restrictions are either impoverished or disincentivized to operate. Action is opposed. Only operations at scale are streamlined because they are approved by operational mechanisms furnished to benefit only those closest to the centralized committee, followed by the well-connected and radially outward to the masses on the fringe, (most of us if we are honest with ourselves). How is socialism not elitist? Must every ethos be universal? Is science applied to society social science? Observe. An economist, one type of social scientist, studies households. A military general, another type of social scientist, studies "divide and conquer." A psychologist studies mental health and insanity. A political scientist studies the human condition. The general, most highly ranked, employs the others to achieve his goals. The socialistic military-industrial complex divides the wealth, homes, and minds in order to inculcate it's beneficent power. What? You don't think you need to defend yourself from foreign invaders? I have news for you! They want what you have and they don't want to pay for it either! Only the 'operations at scale' are protected by their titanic chthonic girth! Who cares if a few goods furnished by slaves are stolen? How are businesses and nations immune from old age, corruption, and eventual death? Corruption is often literal. With a bad heart and a sick mind a person's actions are deemed poor. A murder, a violent abuser, a person who steals, etc. are removed from businesses and nations to put a halt to corrupt insanity before irredeemable suffering resulting in terminal luck. Who wants to see America die? Looters, pillagers, and rapists: foreign spies, enemies of the state, and the occasional Karen who fails to connect action with consequence. Desire is the root of suffering. Just because you don't want the consequences doesn't mean you can change consequence as you can action. But people don't want to change their behavior, which makes them predictable, which internally validates the average social scientist's course of study.
1/28/26
If the
government serves any legitimate purpose it is to maintain law and order. All
they seem to uphold is status quo and decorum anymore. They give the people what they’re used to,
with slight alterations. The law and
order ideal has shifted to a sort of Robin Hood scam where Gmen act like their
job is to take money and redistribute.
Criminality is not biological or psychological, it’s
socio-economic! No one is born bad and
they didn’t have a choice!
I’ve
seen protesters/rioters outside Minnesota governor’s mansion getting
encouragement from Walz. Not much different from J6 if you pick
sides. That people believe anyone in
government (Trump or Walz/red or blue) is on their side is the effectiveness of dualistic propaganda. They all act ‘above the law’ and this is the big lie right now; that no one is (with the exception of poor Juan).
Now, I
could understand fleeing an area unsafe to find sanctuary. Many seeking sanctuary status are doing so
because of US intervention/destabilization.
More people, at the top, ought to be removed (if not criminally charged)
for bad policy (if not outright crimes against humanity). Fact is, people care more about what’s going
on in their own backyard because it’s visible.
See is believing. While I think
that elitist pedophiles are banging minors on Epstein Island, I know that my
car has been broken into and I’m being stolen from. This is effective government inverted
(perhaps perverted). A riot in the
streets effectively distracts from attention spans, limited.
1/12
Why respect? How is a
man with a gun different from an ICE agent?
While ICE’s gun ownership may be secondary to their identity, the fact
remains of ‘man with gun.’ Even those
who fear and eschew weaponry respect its presence as an agent of change; the
firearm factor. Factory subsidies make
rocket-launchers cost-prohibitive. Fear
of the law restricts a weapon’s use.
What is overkill?
Migrating animals assess the risk of roadkill. A fivetenfifty car pileup
on the 204 in rush hour from freak conditions.
Ice on the road demands respect.
It’s cold and scary outside.
There’s safety in numbers until yours is up. A series of bad decisions led me here: the
page. I slept like shit, woke up and
smoked with ill intent. I’m gonna put
something on paper whether you like
it or not ‘cause I’m a bad boy with powers; assumption of risk for one. Mind of a real actuary: figures in
percents. Especially now, since the
States ceased forging pennies, it’s all in your head. Ten percent of twenty is my two cents. If I can rub it, it’s real.
Faith: the power of trust, is two. I could just believe it’s rubbable.
Touch distance. Touch time. Touch
pretending. Touch the liar in her sleep:
apprehend. Roust the tactile
strumpet. “Put her in cuffs.”
“Yes, daddy!”
“Not a protester, move on,” ICE man radios his CO. “We want to catch one resisting arrest.”
What forces of nature are unstoppable?
“They can’t detain us all!” A swarm of
Karen’s like yapping terriers go to town.
“Dog: Taylor Swift tee shirt spotted with coffee stains. 210. A real doozy.” Police-tape like streamers announce the party
of politics. Like dogs by the door, they
anticipate, but what do bad dogs expect?
And what would you do if they all started biting each other? Pull them apart? Or let them eat one another? “Do you think the man with the gun is
incapable?” the officer radios with his vision.
“Let’s check!” She tests a priori rationale by not overly
considering the scenario. Why respect
what is regrettable? Because we loved her once.
(And we know they’d kill us too for profit.)
2/14
Eating a creative gruel; low salt yet spicy. It burned a hole in my tongue.
It reminded me of her; bad and familiar.
How could I be so cruel?
The nature of our relationship and the things she put me through left me
bittersweet.
Too much kneading, “we’re trying to make a biscuit, not a bagel!”
“I can’t do it anymore: pretend to love. I feel like
a big phony when I go anywhere.”
What is it to feel anymore?
Why is it selfish to be numb?
The pain and suffering some endure defies comprehension. It’s not a thought-process I’d want to get
stuck in through too much cogitation, overestimation, or overidentification
with prisoners or their guardian-tormentors.
We know what happened at Stanford. We know bad acting when we see it. Would it be so different if the roles were
reversed? “Why must I act peacefully to
mask the violence in my heart I want so badly to react with? Where is the power I once held over every
other man?”
In hindsight it was obvious. Rapists and
murderers always begin by hiding their guilt in a lie. Career actors, some might say. Whose guard keeps an eye all night?
2/15
“And there shall be signs in the Sun, and in the moon, and
in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea
and the waves roaring;” Luke 21:25
I ask Perplexity®, “Is there a society where prisons
did not exist and what happened to criminals in those cultures?”
Summary:
Small-scale & Stateless:
·
Homicide by kin or community.
·
Banishment.
·
Social shunning or loss of status.
Premodern Agrarian:
·
Corporal punishment
·
Capital punishment
·
Fines and confiscation
Modern:
·
Exile and outlawry
This means a person is stripped of legal protections – the State
spends no more resources on the outlaw.
Even the apparent murder of the outlaw would go uninvestigated.
·
Restrains or marks
Unlike “Premodern Agrarian: Corporal,” the physical mark is
a bulky monitoring device or simply a bureaucratic stigma, making it difficult
for the criminal to find gainful employment in an open market, where a
business-person, when given the choice, would likely hire someone without a
criminal record.
·
Remote labor
This involves sending the prisoner to perform undesirable
tasks that are necessary, but not typically chosen by the general population
without remuneration that would otherwise make the enterprise unprofitable.
I ask, “why prisons?”
·
State-building.
The state building buildings which ultimately announce
control of territory.
·
Reformist penology.
“To err is human; to forgive, divine.” One must ask forgiveness. Will I be forgiven? Should I be forgiven? How is one forgiven? How is one reformed? Is reformation possible within the confines
of the penal colony (if at all?)? Sure,
we all grow up and then grow old, but how is one reformed? The idea of reformation requires a
subject. An individual or an
institution; who or what is reformed? It
can’t just be that they look
different…
Here we have a formulaic furrow -
a channel in the mind, deepening with
each eroding pass. We watch a
documentary
with our baby on the sofa, a lovechild
of Hollywood that defies criticism. [100% on Rotten Tomatoes™]
It’s another movie about cruelty.
How cruel?
Because it defies normal comprehension
it requires empathy; an element of psyche
socialworkers believe is a limited resource (like space at home).
Because empathetic psyche is resource-limited
there arises an argument of value.
This is an economic discussion after all 😐
“How to Better Serve the Incarcerated?”
The title of the brochure received
in the new-hire employee-pack for the Wendy’s®
opening in Gattaca: The penal commune
constructed to better house convicted felons.
“The ‘luxury condos’ in development C
get a little rapey after eight, so we
close after seven,” the manager says.
“Make sure somebody walks you to your car.
Our last fry-cook caught AIDS and
it wasn’t airborne!”
The furrows deepened. “Why
was I selected?”
the newhire thought, “or did my empathy apply?”
Identity molesteé. “Will I molest
myself or
will society?” In subdivision C, zone 3,
your odds are five points higher than four.
6 than 7.
What makes a place feel safe (esp. after dark)?
Lights and trust. Why trust what I know
is
not true? How could you? How can common
sense be defied? The movies!
“So you chose to align with Barabbas?”
The brochure continued, “…you might be a Jew!”
The cleanliness and decency of the kitchen and
staff didn’t escape the newhire’s notice,
taking in his newsurroundings and newidentity.
“Yes, someone else was tortured to death
along with the grief of suddenly and violently
losing a lovedone to a family and a friend
to the community, but at least a murderer is
finally free.”
